- http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/blizzard-2009-snow-totals-new-england-dc-ny-nj-snow-totals-2541969.html
- Determine the credibility - Yes!
- Explain why - December 20, 2009 Jon Azpiri wrote the article on Now Public Crowd Powered Media. The source looks more of a secondary source yet not biased. The source looks more of a blog style website then a news article.
- Will you keep this source? - Yes or no, I haven't decided just yet.
- Determine the credibility - Yes! ...
- Explain why - Colin Beaven's website does look like he got his information from another source making it a secondary source yet this information seems reliable. The author is stated and the publishing/copy right date; 2009-10, is present. The information is not biased since the blizzard of 2009 is not really a topic you can be biased.
- Will you keep this source? - Yes, I want to keep the source.
- Determine the credibility - Yes!
- Explain why - Frederick County Public Schools' website has the information and policies available for the parents and people of the community to see. The site is a primary source of their information yet has no author(s) besides what office the policy will effect. The dates of each "amendment" are available when they are made. Nothing is biased in the website; only policies and what is required within the school system.
- Will you keep this source? - Yes, I will keep this source. Don't let me down, FCPS.
- Determine the credibility - Yes!
- Explain why - ABC News is a credible primary source to cite for my college paper. The authors are stated who are Lisa Stark, John Ryan and Michael S. James and published first on December 20, 2009. The topic of the blizzard of 2009 will not be a biased topic making the information balanced.
- Will you keep this source? - Yes, I will keep this source. I feel comfortable enough to use the information from ABC News in my paper.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Credibility of Sources (Essay #3)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment